U.S. President Joe Biden and one of his top aides warned on Monday that a federal government shutdown could cause widespread suffering, including a rapid loss of food benefits for nearly 7 million low-income women and children.

Biden told a meeting on Historically Black Colleges and Universities that failure by Congress to fund the federal government would have dire consequences for the Black community, including by reducing nutritional benefits, inspections of hazardous waste sites and enforcement of fair housing laws.

He said he and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy had agreed a few months ago on spending levels for the government.

"We made a deal, we shook hands," he said. "Now a small group of extreme House Republicans … don't want to live up to that deal, and everyone in America could be faced with paying the price for it."

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    67
    ·
    1 year ago

    LOL

    The guys who've made 100+ billion appear out of thin air for another country's war are totally concerned about hunger.

    • kimpilled@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Literally just old shit we had in the closet. It’s not pallets of cash, it’s the value of the old equipment that we no longer need to store.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your argument would have legs if the cost of those expenditures were to be deducted from the next budget, but you know it won't be, and you know I'm right.

        That said, yes, Congress has appropriated over $100,000,000,000 for another country's war.

        My point stands.

        • kimpilled@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So instead of what you originally said (that we magicked up extra money for Ukraine), your argument is that we’re using money that we spent anyway, and would keep spending regardless in order to maintain our global standing? Very persuasive.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So your saying that the majority of congress would vote to feed the poor? Last I checked they voted to not feed even the poor children.

      Seriously a stupid take.