• bobman@unilem.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol. The luddites fought to end industrialization because they didn't want technology to take their jobs. That's not a better future for anyone except lazy people who don't want to adapt.

    Sound familiar?

      • bobman@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What are you talking about?

        Or are you just upset I'm criticizing something you like?

        • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You're just saying the word luddites like that's a cogent critique of anything. You clearly know nothing beyond the headline generalities here.

          • bobman@unilem.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            What are you talking about?

            My point, very simply put, is that you're okay with blue collar jobs being automated but not white collar ones.

            Please elaborate on why I "clearly know nothing beyond the headline generalities here." What a vapid, nothing-statement. Lol.

            • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I never said that. All that smugness over words you've put in my mouth. You're either a terrible conversationalist or a troll.

              • bobman@unilem.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Right. You don't have to explicitly say it for it to be true.

                If you're against AI taking white collar jobs, but not blue collar ones, then "you’re okay with blue collar jobs being automated but not white collar ones."

                Lol. Not sure why this needs to be spelled out for you so many times.

                Probably because you don't like what's being said and need to remain cognitively dissonant.

                • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You're inferring positions I haven't taken, and then insisting I have taken them when I clarify that is not my position.

                  Notably ironic that the term "cognitive dissonance" occurs to you in this context.

                  • bobman@unilem.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    So, you're not against AI taking white collar jobs?

                    Or you're not okay with machines replace blue collar jobs?

                    Which is it? Say your stance instead of beating around the bush because you're ashamed of it.

                    Notably ironic that the term “cognitive dissonance” occurs to you in this context.

                    How? It looks to me like you don't even know what that means.