• dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the problem is the rate isn’t high enough. Too many homes are owned by people who already have a home and are using their second, third, fourth homes as sources of income while their primary home is seen as their retirement plan. At the same time, the people who own extra homes are opposed to building high occupancy buildings to create cheaper housing in the same area. You have corporations buying up hundreds of houses only to rent them out. Those get taken off the market, which raises the cost of houses in general.

    If you stop corporations from owning single family homes and duplexes, stop foreign investors from buying real estate at all, place a very high tax on owning more than 2 houses, and place higher taxes on short term rentals like Airbnb then you will drop the value of houses by a ton while also generating tax funds that could build high occupancy buildings for lower rent values. Too many people have the ability pay for affordable houses but can’t, because too many homes are owned as income for either people or corporations.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I already know the answer from conservatives to this one: “SoCiaLisM”

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, but it sucks because it is kind of anti-socialism. It is saying houses belong to individuals, not the state or corporations. However, it does have the flavor of common people seizing the means of production from the bourgeois.