FRANKFORT, Ky. (AP) — Legislation aimed at easing Kentucky’s near-total abortion ban by creating limited exceptions for pregnancies caused by rape or incest was introduced Monday in the GOP-dominated House, as lawmakers wrangle with an issue at the forefront of last year’s campaign for governor.
Republican state Rep. Ken Fleming filed the measure on the last day that new House bills could be introduced in this year’s 60-day session. The bill’s prospects are uncertain, with House Speaker David Osborne saying the chamber’s GOP supermajority has not discussed any particular abortion bill.
Kentucky’s near-total abortion ban has been in place since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022. The state’s so-called trigger law took effect, banning abortions except when carried out to save the mother’s life or to prevent a disabling injury. It does not include exceptions for cases of rape or incest.
Fleming’s proposal would change that by making abortions legal in cases of rape and incest if done no later than six weeks after the first day of the woman’s last menstrual period, according to a statement describing the bill. The measure also would allow an abortion to remove a dead fetus and in cases of a lethal fetal anomaly, meaning the fetus wouldn’t survive after birth.
How many women would say they were raped so they could get an abortion and let a person get convicted over it? There’s tons of stories of teens winding up pregnant and telling their parents they were raped rather than facing what their parents would do/think of them.
See this is why rape exceptions are so hard to get,
Not for the reasonableness of the above cited scenario, but the sheer paranoia conservatives exhibit about having a fast one pulled on their dumbshit morals that escalates to the point of being willing to let women die rather than risk someone being able to pretend to have a complication, no matter how difficult that would be, to slip an abortion past the wannabe morality police.
“Better Ten Innocents Hang than Let Even One Criminal Go Free!”
If the other option was to be prosecuted for murder for lying in order to have an abortion, probably a lot more than it happens today.
Personally, I’d think that just having the abortion in another state would be more appealing than either of those two options.
I was under the impression that republicans have made that very difficult.
How so?
https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/sep/12/anti-choice-states-arent-satisfied-now-they-want-to-punish-traveling-for-abortions
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/abortion-travel-restrictions-texas-republicans-1385437/amp/
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna38301
https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/mar/31/idaho-abortion-travel-ban-women-girls-social-trust
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/06/29/abortion-state-lines/
Wasn’t that hard to find out that republican lawmakers want to bam travelling out of state for abortions. Idaho already have one too.
Trump is campaigning on a national ban for one.
Which, of course, the teens you’re talking about who don’t want to tell their parents can definitely take the time and have the money to pay for, right?