A voter-approved Oregon gun control law violates the state constitution, a judge ruled Tuesday, continuing to block it from taking effect and casting fresh doubt over the future of the embattled measure.

The law requires people to undergo a criminal background check and complete a gun safety training course in order to obtain a permit to buy a firearm. It also bans high-capacity magazines.

The plaintiffs in the federal case, which include the Oregon Firearms Federation, have appealed the ruling to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The case could potentially go all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

  • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The constitution doesn't grant many extremely important rights – including the right to vote – because it was written by slave owners who didn't want to grant those rights to slaves and women.

    If they did add those things, they would have had to explicitly state those rights were for white men only.

    I assume if they had, all the pro-gun people saying "we need to arm mass shooters and idiots because its in the constitution" would also be pro-slavery and anti-suffrage too, since they staunchly oppose changing the constitution no matter how backwards and immoral it may be.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, I'm not opposed to changing the Constitution, I just want people to recognize that given our CURRRENT standing in Congress, it's a logistical impossibility.

      290 votes in the House to even START changing it…