• @AdamantRatPuncher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1510 months ago

    Amazing thanks!

    Well I have the feeling we need a little bit of context here. First, what are the arguments that they refuse to agree with? Is it something like basic political affiliation or normal things like basic ideas, or is it something like climate denial or conspiracy theories? It's a fairly interesting read but it really needs more

    • @Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2410 months ago

      Also, the source for most of these claims is a media CEO; I can't think of a person whose opinion on these matters I would value less.

    • @shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -510 months ago

      None of the above because sane people in sane workplaces don't discuss issues like that. And does it really matter? If someone doesn't have the social skills to realize that politics and religion are "hell no" topics in the workplace, then wouldn't you say they have communication issues?

      • @SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        What if someone is queer in the workplace, and the "opinions" are about them? Or racism?

        Or, what about someone refusing to vaccinate, putting others at risk?

      • @AdamantRatPuncher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        310 months ago

        Outside of work environment and even within them there is the chance that something along those lines may be discussed. My question is simply aimed at that. The ability to discuss and agree with others is an integral part of curriculum vitae and its also actively asked by recruiters and so on for this exact reason. This thing will appear while job hunting, it's a matter of time.