California fast food workers will be paid at least $20 per hour next year under a new law signed Thursday by Gov. Gavin Newsom.

When it takes effect on April 1, fast food workers in the state will have among the highest minimum wages in the country, according to data compiled by the University of California-Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education. The state's minimum wage for all other workers is at $15.50 per hour and is already among the highest in the nation.

Newsom's signature on Thursday reflects the power and influence of labor unions in the nation's most populous state, which have worked to organize fast food workers in an attempt to improve their wages and working conditions.

  • arquebus_x@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Uh… no? It's right there at the bottom:

    The raise takes effect on April 1 and applies to workers at restaurants that have at least 60 locations nationwide

    Small time, local food joints would not be required to raise wages above the current minimum. They'd actually be able to compete more.

    What the heck are you smoking?

    • FUCKRedditMods@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Smoking the usual “reactionary right-wing ignorance”

      And they’re fucking addicted to it. Get your facts out of here.

    • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Indeed - not saying I agree, but this is the main talking point from the fast food companies. It's not fair they have to pay more when (sometimes) slightly smaller businesses do not.

    • betwixthewires@lemmy.basedcount.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      OK I fat fingered 20 instead of 60. That's even better for my argument. To get the good pay you have to work for a huge multinational. Who else has 60 locations in the US alone?

      What are you smoking? You know there's a labor market right? And companies compete for workers? Imagine you run a taco shack and every one of your employees is waiting for the minute there's an opening across the street at taco bell, or the opening of the new burger king down the street. What do you do? High turnover and employee resentment or raise wages? If raising wages means going out of business you're stuck.

      And then small minded people like you will be in a thread in 2 years quoting statistics showing how big corporations are putting smaller ones out of business and taking over all the industries, even going so far as to blame corrupt politicians and corporate capture, conveniently forgetting that you cheered on the very corporate capture legislation that led to it.

      • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        idk personally I think if you can't pay a living wage you don't have a business model, you have a loophole of exploitive policy. Like, you're saying all this and I'm hearing "but without slaves to pick my cotton I'll go out of business!" good

          • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is the fast food lobby's main talking point. Personally, I don't disagree. Decide a living wage, make that the bare minimum for everyone. The talking point however is that "my poor wittle small business can't afford to pay people enough money to live please daddy let me continue the exploitation."

      • stupidfly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is what I knew you meant and very good points by the way.

        They all just showed their own absolute ignorance about how an economy actually functions by their responses.

        I would rather see the franchisees go under for a more limited impact to the economy overall (more inflation).