• Nefyedardu@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    lol you mean your hypocrisy? You said features don't matter. "All Epic needs to do is launch the game, that's good enough!" But now you are saying features do matter. Which is it? Taking this new stance to it's logical conclusion, Steam would obviously be the superior choice, would it not? Steam has more features than Epic, right?

    Pirated games have features that Epic games don't by the way, namely the fact that you own the game and you are not limited by DRM. In my personal opinion that is worth way more than EGS achievements which are completely useless on a store with no social features anyway.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      And by the way, no one believes for a sec that you send a single cent to devs whose games you pirate and no, pirating a game doesn't legally make you an owner of said game.

      • Nefyedardu@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don't pirate games, I buy them from Steam or GoG like everyone else because I'm not an idiot. I have absolutely zero incentive to buy from a platform with no useful features.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Which will requires to download the game beforehand so what's the difference between downloading and installing right away vs downloading to install later? You can still launch the games without logging in.

              It's not 2006 anymore, high speed storage is cheap.

              • Nefyedardu@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That's a terribly wasteful way of thinking, why can't we just download something once and have access to it forever? Steam allows local network installs and GoG has installers, what's Epic excuse? Don't forget, billion dollar company with 1000s of employees :)

                • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  My point is that no matter which option, the data is on your computer, it's no more wasteful to download and install right away vs download the installer and store that data to install it offline later. Heck, you'll need more space with the second option as it requires the installer AND the installed game to be stored.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Me: All I care about is that it launches games

      You: If that's all I wanted (implying that you want more) I would just pirate the games because Epic doesn't offer a product that's better than pirating

      Me: Well, Epic actually offers more than pirating games does if your care about that

      You: Oh now you care about the extra features!

      No, I'm trying to show you that their product meets your demands, that's how arguments work.

      https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/List_of_DRM-free_games

      They proportionally have more DRM free games than Steam too…

      • Nefyedardu@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Me: All I care about is that it launches games

        Then there is zero reason for you to buy games from Epic. That is a function that can be performed for free. It's like paying for air or sunshine. What kind of idiot pays money for something they can get for free?

        You just seem to be completely ignoring the fact that I've already addressed all the features you brought up and most of them are pretty useless or are available to pirated games anyway. Certainly they are not worth actually spending money on when GoG and Steam do all those things and much more. Even if you had cash to spare and you just wanted those features with minimal hassle, there is still zero reason to buy from Epic.

        jfc I've never seen someone defend so vehemently a product not having features. Epic is a multibillion dollar corporation with apparently thousands of employees, they don't need you to bootlick for them.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I buy my games where they're the cheapest and I buy them so the devs can continue making games, you're pretty fucking dumb to waste money to have access to useless features!

          • Nefyedardu@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I buy my games where they’re the cheapest and I buy them so the devs can continue making games

            Oh man, I'm about to blow your mind then!

            STEAM KEYS

            Devs get more money since Valve doesn't get their 30% cut and they are cheaper than the Epic counterparts! It's a perfect solution!

            What is the status of Epic's key program btw, is that something they don't have? Shocker.

            you’re pretty fucking dumb to waste money to have access to useless features!

            I literally use Steam Proton, Steam Input and my Steam Deck nearly every day, and SteamVR at least a couple times a month. All things Epic doesn't have. Gaming would be super annoying if I was actually forced to use EGS. Billion dollar company with thousands of employees, btw.