• telepresence@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    i kinda wanna say atomic habits. the concepts it presents are functional but it presents them in an extermly forgettable and uninteresting way.

  • TheV2@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s probably “Rich Dad, Poor Dad”. If you’re interested in any personal finance book, there is already nothing to learn.

    • OriginalUsername7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      The entire thing is the author wanking himself silly over his knowledge of pop culture references from his childhood. Some of it reads like it was written by a 14 year old who isn’t all that into books.

      The bit about the gaming suit that wanks the user off but also means you’re exercising so you get fit from wearing it was honestly one of the cringiest things I’ve ever read. If I thought the author was capable of the level of self reflection required, I’d have thought writing that part of the book was him acknowledging that the book is literally a work of literary masturbation.

      It should have received the same response as The Room; a bad book only made into a cult classic by the people laughing at it.

      • UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I enjoyed Ready Player One at the time even though some of it was just ridiculous. Re-enacting Ferris Buellers Day Off for example.

        Armada, Cline’s next book was awful. So many references on every page, I stopped reading. I remember a line that was something like, “my mum wouldn’t let me past, like Gandelf in the mines of Moria.” Sheesh! Let it go!

        I fully read Ready Player Two but the guy has no story telling abilities. Every time the main character encounters a problem, e.g. I need a level 49 sword to get past this problem, but there’s no way to get one, it was always solved with the same solution, “oh, I own the game and all Admins have level 1000 swords because we do!”

        I think I reached my limit when he managed to shove in a Shaun of the Dead reference just because he mentioned a cricket bat!

  • frigidaphelion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    The bible. Set aside any religious connotations and just look at it as a piece of literature: it’s terrible.

    • Caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I listened to Atlas Shrugged as an audio book and it was ok at best. One massive criticism of communism and how it doesn’t work but suggested anarchist society as the solution. Weird rape-y sex scene in the middle also. Should have stuck with the social criticism instead of anarco capitalism utopia stuff and it’d have been good.

  • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Mein Kampf. I read it when i was still a succdem, expecting some genius rant that converted people en masse to nazism. Instead it was barely coherent disgusting racist drivel. I guess this book didn’t make anyone into nazi, it just given nazis what they would like to read. This and the fact nazi state bought huge amounts of it to distribute, making Hitler richest writer in Germany.

      • blackbirdbiryani@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        It really puts your suspension of disbelief to the test, and all the characters are terrible. I actually thought the netflix show was better than the book because the characters were alot more relatable.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yah, totally forgot to mention how horrendously bad the characters were. Like 50’s SF bad.

        • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yeah same here, I thought it was one of the few cases where the adaptation was better than the book. It cuts out a lot of the waffle from the books and patches up lots of holes, especially with characters like you said.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        The handwaving “science” part. And then in the end there’s this deus ex machina plot point that comes out that makes all the rest of the plot utterly pointless.

        I’ve read a lot of SF, that was the worst because I had such high hope for it after reading what everyone had to say about it. And it turned me off reading anything that’s won a Hugo entirely. That and Redshirts…

  • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    The Great Gatsby.

    I’ve read a lot of books, but that one I literally remember nothing about. Not a quote, not a character, not the plot… All I remember is the cover was some weird abstract art piece with creepy eyes, my brain purged everything else about it book. Probably for my own sanity.

  • Muffi@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    Revelation Space by Alastair Reynolds. I am usually a huge SciFi fan, but I like the genre for it’s ability to reflect on humanity by extrapolating on current technologies/trends or comparing our culture to unique alien ones.

    Revelation Space was technobabble and descriptions of weapons for pages upon pages, and it was totally devoid of any philosophy or reflection on humanity. I never DNF a book, but this one I almost gave up on.

  • hackeryarn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    War and Peace. Heard so many good things about it. Despite everything, went in not having super high expectations.

    The whole book turned out like a reality tv show. All the characters had some petty drama that they blew out of proportion. Hundreds of pages where nothing really happens, people just complain or bad mouth other characters.

    I had to stop half way through.

      • hackeryarn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        That looks really well done. And a lot of stuff would be condensed by having viduals.

        Doesn’t look like my preferred style… Maybe that’s why I couldn’t get into the book either 😅

        • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          I tried reading the book but it was too much for me, so the series was easier to follow. I also tried listening to an audio book of tale of two cities but couldn’t get past the narrator constantly changing voices and accents for characters. I prefer when they just read

    • Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      I could only make a few pages in to the first chapter, it was hard to read, very, very detailed, which should be a good thing but I found myself losing track of where we even were or what the scene was about for all the detail. Once they started describing the buttons on the coat of one of the characters and how it had been the fashion some years prior at a some point in the 19th century to wear them that way… I gave up. I’d like to try again some time but I can’t see myself experiencing it differently. Curious about the 7 years in the making Soviet film adaptation, but its also 7 hours long.

  • VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s been quite a while since I’ve read it, so this may not be a fair assessment. But, I fucking hated The Catcher in the Rye. I wasn’t even required to read it for school or anything, I just did. Perhaps I just found Holden to be insufferable. I think that was the point, but it did not make it a particularly enjoyable or insightful read at all, save for the overwhelming supertext of DO NOT BE LIKE THIS GUY. The part where he hires a prostitute and just cries in front of her really stuck in my mind. That was when it really sunk in for me that someone read this book and decided that Holden’s views were so accurate that he had to go shoot John Lennon with a gun for being phony. Almost unbelievable.

    • hactar42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m curious at what age you read it. Because I first read it at 15 and thought it was the best book ever. I would even recommend it to people for years.

      Then I read it again in my late 20s and had the same reaction you did. I thought he just came off as a whiny little shit. I still feel embarrassed that I recommended that book to people for over 10 years.

      I remember telling my wife this after I reread it (she was someone I recommended it to) and she was like, “yeah, I didn’t want to say anything at the time, but I hated it.”

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        When I was 13 I thought “You go Holden! Tell off all those phonies!” At 18 I thought “This whiny asshole won’t stfu.” Then as an adult I realized “Oh, poor kid was dealing with a lot of unaddressed trauma.”

        • hactar42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Then as an adult I realized “Oh, poor kid was dealing with a lot of unaddressed trauma.”

          I hadn’t thought of that angel before. That’s actually a really good way to look it.

      • VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        It was the end of 9th grade, so I was 15 or 16. I read it immediately after To Kill a Mockingbird, which did not make it look good in comparison 😂

  • ef9357@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    50 Shades… terrible writing and the sex was boring AF. The books were recommended to me. I couldn’t get through the first one. Time I’ll never get back.