Business says it doesn’t serve anyone who is armed

  • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    …Yeah, do you realize how bad taste it is to compare not letting cops in to Jim Crow discrimination against Black folks? Y’know, the people cops kill a lot?

    I see what you’re trying to do, but…can you please not.

    • knightry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wait, are you replying to me or the person I was replying to? Because you’re saying the exact same thing I was, but you’re getting up voted and I’m getting down voted and now it feels like everyone is misunderstanding my post lol.

        • knightry@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I guess nuance doesn’t always come across on the internet.

          I was pointing out that allowing businesses to reject anyone for any reason doesn’t go over well. The “no color allowed” was common signage from segregated businesses in Jim Crow era times.

            • knightry@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              I wasn’t comparing, I was simply responding to the ops statement,. if I was responding to your post, I would have made a top-level comment, not a reply to a specific commenter. In no way is rejecting cops the same as racism, and for the record I’m all for the former. I just didn’t like the notion of the original ops comment, which is why I replied to them and not to you.

              • mob@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You are getting a funny reaction but I get you.

                Dude said legalize “no questions asked discrimination” and you referenced a very well known example of discrimination in recent history. Seemed like a logical response to me.

                • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah, but the issue is using that particular example in a post talking about police.

                  Also, as a Black American, it’s really tiring when we and discrimination against us get pulled out to use as examples. Like, just keep us out of it some times.

                  • mob@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Thats goofy.

                    You’re telling me that if the conversation starts with cops, you agree with someone saying “they should be able to turn anyone away, no questions asked.”?

                    Dude didn’t say discriminating against cops is the same as discriminating against black people.

                  • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    I don’t know what you’re not getting. Your post was about police specifically. The top comment of this chain days for any reason whatsoever, which could include, but is not limited to, race. The post isn’t wrong, the top level comment here is because some people would use the liberty of blocking anyone they want to ban people of color, which has happened in the past hence the example.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Everyone is misunderstanding your post. Add the words “your suggested policy could lead back to” before the sign you were referencing. I only finally got that context by reading the entire thread just now