• Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    like stated prior, while she is under no obligation to suggest anything, the fact that she did not at all indicates her intention

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      And her intention has nothing to do with anything in this case, no ones intentions here do. This is sadly not a criminal matter (it should have been) so other then modifying damages intent has no real bearing here.

    • SRo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      What I don’t get is what’s with you suggesting that her wanting the house for herself is a somewhat morally wrong thing. It’s her house. Idiots build it on her land; tough luck shitheads, it’s hers now.