• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Usually because those authoritarians have the power to kill them. Armed guards have the power to kill Elon.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        By holding the purse strings (the economy will have collapsed) and by making the laws (which won’t exist anymore).

        Also, I think you underestimate the loyalty of a paid security staff when they stop getting paid.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          What makes you think they’re not being paid anymore? Of course they are. Just the coinage that’s changed really.

            • njm1314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Food, shelter, creature comfort, the last little bit of a civilization that exists, Etc…

              Historically speaking that’s been enough for a lot of people. A lot of those authoritarian dictators throughout history stayed on a long time. Sure they could have been killed, but that inertia takes over.

                • njm1314@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Maybe, maybe not. Which has been my point the whole time you’ll notice. The inertia. People of historically put up with the crazy ass dictator the whole time. Why? Same reason we I’ll put up with nonsense in our daily lives, it’s easier. People like stability. Your scenario is just one possibility, but it’s by no means a guaranteed possibility.

                  • andxz@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    You’re not wrong, necessarily, but I do believe a lot of people would get really violent really fast if some asshole billionaire showed up with threats and a shock collar. Especially if they are armed and trained.

                    I’d rather take my chances living rough, tbh. I feel like that’d be more stable than living under some nutcase with a button to press.

                  • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Most authoritarian regimes generate revenue that can be distributed among the people who keep the regime going. If you kill the dictator, you would have to take over the operations to keep the money flowing. However, if there’s a total breakdown of society, then the dictator has a big treasury, but no income. So the guards have a choice between either getting a small cut of the treasury each month, or killing the dictator/billionaire, and taking all of the treasury for themselves.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    I really don’t think very many, if any, people Elon would pay for post-apocalyptic bunker security would be sycophants. Paid security usually isn’t. And the type of people who love Elon would not make for good security.