They do this all the time. Maybe Biden should call their bluff, execute his powers as Commander in Chief, and order the National Guard in Texas to turn on State Police.

  • silverbax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I guess Texas doesn’t understand they don’t have an army, but the US government already has a massive base right in the center of Texas.

    They can secede and then ask the US and Mexico for aid when they collapse, but there won’t be a civil war. Idiots.

      • silverbax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Each state has a National Guard unit, but it’s still part of the US Army. That’s what it’s called a National Guard.

        • SpezBroughtMeHere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          So you’re not aware that while National Guard can be called for active service they are actually under the control of the governor?

          • silverbax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Of course, but they aren’t a Texas army. The President can just decide to move them out or use them as needed.

            The US government is paying those soldiers.

    • Anti-Face Weapon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      They actually do have an army. Most states have a state guard or reserves/militia.

      Edit: I did research and the state guards are branches of the national guard placed under the control of the state. Meaning that they are in the U.S. army, as the other user states.

      • silverbax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Those are US Army soldiers, paid by the US government. Control of the state reserves is only delegated to the Governor, because that makes sense. The individual governors can freely send them to areas which are in need. But the President can take back control at any time. If the governor of Texas decided to take the reserves under his direction and attack the US, they’d be placed right back under US control.

        They are not a “Texas” army. They are part of the US Army delegated to Texas.

        • Anti-Face Weapon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I have researched it and I was mistaken. What you are saying is correct.

          Really makes this whole thing extra strange, given that many states have sent their reserves to Texas. Political theater.