Exactly, maybe you should review the conversation. I didn’t ask for proof of God’s non-existence until someone claimed to have it. I asked for it to be presented as I found evidence of a negative to be an absurd premise. and I wanted to know where they were going with that.
Perhaps you should review the conversation. You asked for a source.
There is plenty of evidence as to evolution. None for creationism. Logically a very simple conclusion. You have to be intentionally ignorant to not draw the correct conclusion. I’m so happy most teens see through this nonsense. You want me to prove something that you claim to exist. That logic is precisely in line with the entitlement of the religious.
You declare he exists. Prove it. Simple. It’s not on me to prove, I’m not claiming he exists.
It doesn’t even matter really because you’re arguing in bad faith. You’re not open to having your mind changed. I could deliver indisputable proof and you wouldn’t believe it. I’m not wasting my time debating a fool.
No no no no no no no no, I think you really need to review the conversation, because I never said that God existed. (Actually at the beginning of the comment chain I specifically said he didn’t)
Someone merely said there was proof that he didn’t and I asked them to present it.
Additionally I never argued in favor of creationism, all I ever said about it was that it wasn’t a position the Catholic Church held.
Instead of listing off insults, maybe you should pay attention to what the other person is actually saying
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution
That is not evidence against the existence of God. Hell the Catholic Church has officially denounced Creationism.
Why am I being devoted, the existence of God and the truth of evolution are not incompatible and only fundementalist extremist groups claim otherwise.
You can’t prove a negative, you must prove his existence first.
Exactly, maybe you should review the conversation. I didn’t ask for proof of God’s non-existence until someone claimed to have it. I asked for it to be presented as I found evidence of a negative to be an absurd premise. and I wanted to know where they were going with that.
Perhaps you should review the conversation. You asked for a source. There is plenty of evidence as to evolution. None for creationism. Logically a very simple conclusion. You have to be intentionally ignorant to not draw the correct conclusion. I’m so happy most teens see through this nonsense. You want me to prove something that you claim to exist. That logic is precisely in line with the entitlement of the religious.
You declare he exists. Prove it. Simple. It’s not on me to prove, I’m not claiming he exists. It doesn’t even matter really because you’re arguing in bad faith. You’re not open to having your mind changed. I could deliver indisputable proof and you wouldn’t believe it. I’m not wasting my time debating a fool.
No no no no no no no no, I think you really need to review the conversation, because I never said that God existed. (Actually at the beginning of the comment chain I specifically said he didn’t)
Someone merely said there was proof that he didn’t and I asked them to present it.
Additionally I never argued in favor of creationism, all I ever said about it was that it wasn’t a position the Catholic Church held.
Instead of listing off insults, maybe you should pay attention to what the other person is actually saying