• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How much energy does recycling them use? Because that's another issue I see. If recycling LDPE, PET or MDPE ends up having a bigger carbon footprint than just throwing them away, that should be a factor.

    • trash80@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You have to sort the plastic, shred it, wash it, melt it, and form it. It takes time, energy, and money. It isn't free and it is right to recognize that. I don't think there is a way that recycling can have a lower carbon footprint than just outright throwing something away.

      That said, if you're throwing something away and need to manufacture something to replace it, I'm not sure that you shouldn't be comparing the carbon footprint of recycling to the carbon footprint of new manufacture rather than disposal.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It isn’t free and it is right to recognize that.

        They're paying people to recycle, they're not charging them for it. So it is free for people to recycle and whoever is paying for recycling is losing money.

        But otherwise, fine.

        • trash80@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I only meant free in the sense that recycling obeys the laws of thermodynamics. You don't get something for nothing.