• YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    They wouldn’t pay for the surgery. Why cover medical costs when you can buy more guns!

    • SPRUNT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They wouldn't pay for the surgery, but they'd spend millions to pay for the politicians who would sign-in-to-law a mandate that it must be done "for the safety of the children". It's then up to the parent to comply with that law at their own cost.

      The end game makes a lot more sense when you factor in the GQP's forced-birth policies.