The man told jurors he spent hours listening to far-right podcasts before breaking into the Pelosi home and attacking the then-Speaker’s husband with a hammer.

  • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everything I said was true. Just because you think it's wrong doesn't mean it is. Maybe do a little research outside your bubble.

    • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      My brother in Christ, I was there watching it happen. I saw the sad, misogynistic weirdos who used it as an excuse to harass women or as a way to gain a platform (ie, Ian Miles Cheong, Miles Yiannoppoulos). So miss me with that. Hell, Cheong and I used to follow each other on Twitter before his heel turn during GG. So yeah. Miss me with that.

      • Zorque@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, those are the people who used it to gain clout. That doesn't mean that's not how it started, though. There was a loss of objectivity in game journalism due to personal relationships, then a bunch of mysoginistic shitbags took the bag and ran as far as they could so they could gain a podium to spout their hatred.

        It's never just one thing.

      • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Some people had different ideas about it but the vast majority that I saw were all about corruption in games journalism. Sure a lot of trolls got their start there too but it doesn't mean that was the point.

        • djsoren19@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The vast majority of the movement was misogynistic, but even the parts that were legitimately focused on corruption were focused on the AAA devs "paying" for preferential reviews of their garbage. That A. hasn't stopped and B. had nothing to do with indie developers.

          • thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This seems rampant in mobile app reviews, too. Using the Health Equity app made me pissed enough to go look at the app reviews in the Google Play store. Shocking - if you look at all the people that give it 5 star, glowing (canned) reviews? Who did they work for? Just take a look for their names on LinkedIn and it'll be real obvious what was happening.

            Not a 1:1 comparison, but your thread immediately reminded me of it.