His win is a direct result of the Supreme Court's decision in a pivotal LGBTQ+ rights case.

  • kool_newt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is about my position. If somebody wants to discriminate, then a business is not the right structure for them. Same with public service, if you choose to be mayor, your responsibility is to everyone, not just a preferred subset.

    Edit: To go further, talking about where to draw the line. I think for a business that's an easy answer, the law. As a photo business for example they'd have have the duty to be available for hire to photograph any legal activity. But someone asking to photograph abuse or something is crossing the line.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree with that last point. You can't be required to photograph crimes, and I'll take it a step further and say you don't have to offer your services to everyone. A wedding photographer doesn't have to do proms, and a baker doesn't have to make cookies. But if you photograph weddings and you bake wedding cakes, you can and should be prohibited from discriminating against clients based on your religion.