His win is a direct result of the Supreme Court's decision in a pivotal LGBTQ+ rights case.

  • MumboJumbo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    To say that anyone can be a photographer belittles the skill associated with a professional photographer. That's akin to saying that you can hire anyone with a voice to be a singer. Sure, you can, but there's a qualitative difference.

    That aside, would there be any sign that the photographer could put on their door that would be illegal? No Blacks, No Jews, No Women, etc… If not, play that to the logical extreme; What if all photographers in town had the same sign? What services are appropriate to deny in entirety to a specific class of people.

    • zaph@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That's akin to saying that you can hire anyone with a voice to be a singer. Sure, you can, but there's a qualitative difference.

      Yes anyone with a camera can be a photographer just like anyone with a paintbrush can be a painter. Just because it takes skill to be good at them doesn't mean the unskilled are just babies with fisherprice cameras pretending.