Republicans have a racist new idea amid the war on Gaza.

  • kromem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    That's…the entire point of the phrase.

    Are you just realizing this?

    Boy are you in for a surprise when you find out that "cutting off your nose to spite your face" is slipping more and more towards the face not having a nose anymore.

    • dx1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That's an odd response to what I wrote…what I said is that the two choices are becoming more and more evil, not that they are evil in the first place. Which is not how that phrase has typically been used (to justify selecting the lesser of the two evils).

      Which, side note, may make sense in the context of, there are actually only two choices. But what we do is collectively lock ourselves into those two choices and then choose between them, when there are not only other parties and independent candidates we could support, but entirely separate political systems we could move to.

      • kromem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The entire point is selecting the lesser of two evils.

        If you choose to eat strawberry ice cream instead of dog poop, that's not selecting the lesser of two evils.

        If you choose to eat bugs instead of dog poop, that's where you'd refer to it as the lesser of two evils.

        Having an objectively good option and an objectively terrible one isn't choosing the lesser of two evils.

        Having a terrible one and a slightly less terrible one is.

        You are correct that we shouldn't need to be choosing between the lesser of two evils, but that phrase only really applies when both options suck.