What the fuck are the studios gonna do, make movies and shows without actors?

Highlights: The negotiating committee of the actors’ union, SAG-AFTRA, told its members on Saturday that it had received a “Last, Best and Final Offer” from the major entertainment studios as a strike that has brought much of Hollywood to a standstill continued for a 114th day.

“We are reviewing it and considering our response within the context of the critical issues addressed in our proposals,” the negotiating committee said. They did not say when they would respond to the offer, which came after an hourlong video conference call that included top studio executives.

Included in the offer was a wage increase that could be the highest in four decades, according to a person familiar with the offer who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the negotiations. The studios also offered the actors a new way to determine residuals for streaming programs based on performance metrics, and protections on artificial intelligence, including consent and compensation requirements. The studios also offered an increase to the pension and health funds.

  • stella@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don't get it. You got paid $25/hour for your work and you're still complaining, why? Because it's a gig?

    Why should your gigs pay more when you can do something else useful for society while you're not getting gigs?

    I'm sorry if you think your list matters at all. All it does is show me the disconnect people like you have with those who work significantly harder than you for significantly less. I think they should get paid more before you do.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because it's not very good pay in return for a) what you have to give for it and b) more importantly — what studios get for it.

      • stella@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I disagree with your point A.

        On point B, studios should get less. It's not that actors should make more.

        This means cheaper products for audiences and more money they can spend on other things (not extra profits for studios.)

        Heck, some of that money could even go towards those who work harder than you for less!

        • detectivesniffles@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          why should these workers not negotiate for better earnings because other workers in other fields work harder for less? it comes across as just silly rationalizations for the crux of the issue which is that you simply don't respect the work actors put in

          • stella@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            that you simply don’t respect the work actors put in

            Wrong. I don't respect passing a bunch of money around at the top.

            If there are people who work significantly harder than you for less money, you don't need more. The guy I was replying to mentioned how much studios make vs. actors. I replied by saying the solution is for studios to make less, not for actors to make more.

            Of course, if you're indoctrinated to believe everyone 'needs' more money except billionaires, then nothing I say is going to make sense. You need to learn what the word 'need' means first.