• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    First of all, duh! Selling bronze age superstitions as higher education is inherently fraudulent, so of course they're gonna be lying about other stuff too.

    Second, can AP please stop with the "alleged" bullshit? It's not like they're going to be sued (at least not successfully) by stating affirmatively that the practices by law ARE proven deceptive. That's why they're being fined.

    • jay9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      The alleged is probably more a policy thing.

      Like where does the organisation draw the line between “obviously guilty” and “obviously not guilty” - there has to be a bar set somewhere. And right now, it is the legal definition.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        As I've heard it explained, "alleged" is when someone is accused but not (yet) declared guilty/liable in court.

        Them being fined would indicate that there's no longer any need for such ass-covering and continuing to do so could be construed as bias against the judgment of the court being correct.

        It's probably just sloppy journalism, though, but that's bad enough in itself.