@FUCKERM to internet funeral@lemmy.worldEnglish • 9 months agoUH OH!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square174fedilinkarrow-up11.28Karrow-down146
arrow-up11.23Karrow-down1imageUH OH!lemmy.world@FUCKERM to internet funeral@lemmy.worldEnglish • 9 months agomessage-square174fedilink
minus-square@TheFriar@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish24•9 months agoEveryone here is saying this. Using Bing as an engine while maintaining peivacy doesn’t seem as much of a problem to me. Can you explain why pointing out that bing being under the hood is seen as a negative?
minus-square@IronKrill@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglish2•9 months agoI assume because Bing gives the exact same spam results as Google. All of the seatch engines kinda suck nowadays.
minus-square@Tick_Dracy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•9 months agoThat’s like saying Brave is the same as Chrome, just because it’s using the Chromium engine. DDG is not Bing. It uses Bing’s search engine!
minus-square@SpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish-2•9 months agoDDG is a search engine without its own search engine.
DuckDuckGo is just Bing.
Everyone here is saying this. Using Bing as an engine while maintaining peivacy doesn’t seem as much of a problem to me. Can you explain why pointing out that bing being under the hood is seen as a negative?
I assume because Bing gives the exact same spam results as Google. All of the seatch engines kinda suck nowadays.
That’s like saying Brave is the same as Chrome, just because it’s using the Chromium engine. DDG is not Bing. It uses Bing’s search engine!
DDG is a search engine without its own search engine.