• Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    they lost subscribers to their no password sharing policy.

    In what world? They gained subscribers when they did that lol.

    Their content sucks, and people are starting to cut ties, but don't pretend it's because people were upset they couldn't share their accounts.

    • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They lost subscribers and gained subscribers. The net total may have increased but they absolutely lost people from doing that.

      • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Okay. You could say that if three people left and 8 million could have signed up. It'd be factually true. So?

        The comment I replied to was claiming the price hike is because they lost subs because of the password changes. That implies the loss was big enough to reduce their income to the point they needed more. It's not.

        • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree with you there. There could be negative repercussions involving the subscribers they did lose in the form of bad PR.