Business says it doesn’t serve anyone who is armed

  • knightry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m all for telling cops to get fucked, but this is probably a bad take.

    NO COLORED ALLOWED

    • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      …Yeah, do you realize how bad taste it is to compare not letting cops in to Jim Crow discrimination against Black folks? Y’know, the people cops kill a lot?

      I see what you’re trying to do, but…can you please not.

      • knightry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wait, are you replying to me or the person I was replying to? Because you’re saying the exact same thing I was, but you’re getting up voted and I’m getting down voted and now it feels like everyone is misunderstanding my post lol.

          • knightry@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            I guess nuance doesn’t always come across on the internet.

            I was pointing out that allowing businesses to reject anyone for any reason doesn’t go over well. The “no color allowed” was common signage from segregated businesses in Jim Crow era times.

              • knightry@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                I wasn’t comparing, I was simply responding to the ops statement,. if I was responding to your post, I would have made a top-level comment, not a reply to a specific commenter. In no way is rejecting cops the same as racism, and for the record I’m all for the former. I just didn’t like the notion of the original ops comment, which is why I replied to them and not to you.

                • mob@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You are getting a funny reaction but I get you.

                  Dude said legalize “no questions asked discrimination” and you referenced a very well known example of discrimination in recent history. Seemed like a logical response to me.

                  • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Yeah, but the issue is using that particular example in a post talking about police.

                    Also, as a Black American, it’s really tiring when we and discrimination against us get pulled out to use as examples. Like, just keep us out of it some times.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Everyone is misunderstanding your post. Add the words “your suggested policy could lead back to” before the sign you were referencing. I only finally got that context by reading the entire thread just now

    • SocialEngineer56@notdigg.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is being a law enforcement officer a protected class?

      Saying something like “I refuse to serve you in the basis of your race” is illegal because race is a protected class. Whereas “I refuse to serve you because your Lemmy hit-takes are dumb” is perfectly legal! Same as refusing to serve armed thugs masquerading as the good guys.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just had a situation with this at work that I talked to my wife about. A customer wanted us to do something with an image that had full frontal nudity and my bosses had to have a discussion about whether or not to allow it. My wife said, “aren’t they required to?” I pointed out that if that was true, we wouldn’t be able to refuse Neo-Nazis.