@vegeta@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world • edit-217 days agoSupreme Court rejects bid to restrict access to abortion pillwww.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1404arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up1402arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court rejects bid to restrict access to abortion pillwww.nbcnews.com@vegeta@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world • edit-217 days agomessage-square40fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink6•17 days agoThey need a more compelling case of mifepristone causing harm. It’s probably best for those who use it to keep their experiences private if possible.
minus-square@Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilink21•17 days agoThey need a case where mifepristone has caused any harm at all to the plaintiffs at the very least. That this case even got here is a testament to the insanity of the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
minus-square@FlowVoid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish9•17 days agoEven that wouldn’t work. If a drug causes you harm, you sue the company that made it. They need a compelling case of how the FDA harmed them in order to sue the FDA. I don’t think that will be easy.
They need a more compelling case of mifepristone causing harm. It’s probably best for those who use it to keep their experiences private if possible.
They need a case where mifepristone has caused any harm at all to the plaintiffs at the very least. That this case even got here is a testament to the insanity of the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Even that wouldn’t work. If a drug causes you harm, you sue the company that made it.
They need a compelling case of how the FDA harmed them in order to sue the FDA. I don’t think that will be easy.