• @Nollij@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2324 days ago

    Many judges grant the defense way more leeway than the prosecution. One reason is actually pretty brutal- it keeps them from having something to appeal.

    Trump obviously wants to drag this out as long as possible, and keep re-rolling the dice until he wins. Preventing that is a worthy goal.

    • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      624 days ago

      While there is some credence for that, it’s not like it only applies to fascists.

      Yet they always get preferential treatment at trial.

      Regardless of if that’s like Trump’s case where he appointed the judge, or this one where the other party appointed the judge.

      In both situations, the judges are more lenient with fascists than literally any other demographic.

      trump isnt the only example, look at all the 1/6 trials.

      Our justice system has a bias towards fascists, and regardless of the reasoning of the person showing the bias, they all believe it’s justified for one reason or another.

      And it’s always the wrong strategy when dealing with fascists.

    • This is particularly true for politicalized trials, because appeals courts are almost always more conservative than the lower courts. As you appeal higher, the courts tend to be more and more conservative, so a conservative’s chances of winning increase. So if you want to prevent a conservative from winning on appeal, the best way is to never give them anything to appeal in the first place.