• @harderian729@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -124 months ago

    Yes you did, but that’s fine if you don’t want to.

    I don’t expect you to articulate your argument because you’re not confident in it.

    • @HikingVet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Here we go again, what’s your thoughts on gangs in the LAPD? Why was the comment earlier about them existing not part of the conversation? Why are gangs a concern when its not the cops?

      • @harderian729@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -8
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        They both can be concerns.

        Gangs are the ones that justify cops’ existence, though. Without cops, gangs will just have their way with everyone like they do in Mexico and did in El Salvador.

        We experimented with not having cops in CHAZ and gangs started killing people very quickly.

        • @HikingVet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          74 months ago

          Okay, you are answering questions, now what about LA not being the most dangerous city makes it the worst place to be a cop? And why do the cops in LA keep shooting people with non dangerous objects in their hands? Why did you pivot from the questions about police corruption to pointing to gangs when cops are part of that problem?

          • @harderian729@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -124 months ago

            Sorry, I’m done arguing with you.

            It’s clear you just want to keep responding, so I’ll give you the last response.

            Goodbye.

            • @HikingVet@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              74 months ago

              I mean, there isn’t much of a conversation if two parties don’t have a back and forth.

              But hey, you like running from questions I geuss.