• 0 Posts
  • 13 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 13th, 2024

help-circle
rss



  • If they really understood the phrase ‘too many cooks spoil the soup’, then they’d realize the advantage of smaller online communities.

    Reddit was at its best when it had a low count but engaged userbase, and became actively worse as it grew.

    I think this is because trolling and response isn’t a 1 to 1 ratio. All it takes is 1 toxic person to make an entire subforum rancid and takes the effort of several mods to mitigate it.

    The more people you have, the more chance you will have these trolls organize, the more likely they will either overwhelm or infiltrate the mods.





  • The anti-zionists I know are not antisemitic, and I have not seen them be antisemitic.

    Pretty interesting how blind you are to your own confirmation bias.

    Since I’m in a bad mood, I’ll point it out to you.

    If you are not antisemitic, likely you do not tolerate being around antisemitic people. Therefore the anti-zionists you know are not antisemitic.

    I, on the other hand, was born in the state of drunken alligator fights and hookworm, where 60% of the population is antisemitic AND anti-zionist, so I have seen it many, many times.

    but I almost never see people do this.

    Then you should learn to appreciate the fact you don’t live in the middle of the deep south and the culture that surrounds you is a lot more sane and reasonable than a good chunk of the nation actually is.

    For example, the ‘Jewish space laser’ conspiracy theory is BOTH antisemitic and anti-zionist.




  • Agreed, there is a legitimate way to criticize the Israeli government that isn’t tied to race.

    The antisemite says “They are monsters because they are Jews”

    The anti-zionist says “They are monsters because they act inhumanely towards civilians”

    The antisemitic anti-zionist says “They act inhumanely towards civilians because they need to gather precious child blood for their (((rituals)))”

    But the problem here is that there are a FUCKTONNE of antisemites that want to hide in the crowds of the anti-zionists for ideological cover.

    On the OTHER hand, I’ve never seen an anti-zionist hide in the crowds of the antisemites for ideological cover unless they also harbored racist misbeliefs.

    It’s pretty easy on the face to tell the difference, but even that level of nuance is beyond the understanding of so many people.


  • without browsers, I don’t think there would be a need for most of that, as there would be no need to create the visually compelling but ultimately ridiculously overmoduled live documents.

    Esports would still exist just like normal sports existed before the internet. Technically esports predates the world wide web as coin op competitions already existed and sometimes even made it into international news.

    Again streaming sites would still exist as mentioned due to the high serving costs, and esports could easily be part of their lineup.

    How would we be viewing simple stuffs like blogs then?

    There is still place for documents on the internet without the WWW. back in the BBS days, we’d download text file magazines to read offline (lol sometimes having to save days and days of download credits just for a TEXT file! Man dialup was crazy. That said, without having to have one (kinda) standardized way to view documents those file formats would evolve beyond just text into something more like OpenOffice document formatting, again without the capitalism-driven effort to make snazzy, eyecatching but ultimately useless dynamically served document formats.

    Honestly I think the dynamically served aspect of modern WWW documents is such a ridiculous waste of resources and bandwidth that not having it may just as well constitute a technical advancement over what we have today.


  • Well, back in the day you’d have a series of different services, usenet, irc, email, and for articles (at the time usually scholarly articles) you could use Gopher or follow certain usenet groups to find FTP sites hosting the docs.

    So if we didn’t have a unified web browser, and those technologies advanced at the pace of other similar services, here is how I see it:

    Most services would be accessed by discrete apps, one for your email, one for your chat, one for your remote and local documents.

    We wouldn’t see the proliferation of siloed services, platforms like Facebook that offer all of these services but only within their subscribers. They just simply wouldn’t be able to compete with the established services or add nuance or extra value.

    Discord would also likely have come into existence a lot earlier and unified some of those services, but again if they chose to silo it as they are doing now, they wouldn’t gain market dominance over already existing wide communities.

    Without the profit incentive, existing services have no reason to tie their users to their platform or inhibit cross platform interactions.

    Streaming services would still come into existence and fragment and silo like they are now, but that’s only because of the cost of providing reliable HD video content isn’t easily dispersed across unsiloed userbases.

    Web advertisements would be non-existant but you’d still get spots in podcasts and videos.

    Frankly I think it would be a better internet than what we have now.