Republican US senator Tommy Tuberville has said he will continue to block hundreds of military leadership appointments despite the Hamas attack on Israel, a close American ally, that has triggered a deadly escalation in the Middle East conflict.

Tuberville has for several months put a hold on at least 300 military nominees, which are typically confirmed in a routine manner by the US senate. The blockade is a protest over a Pentagon policy which facilitates abortions for service members and dependents.

The former Auburn University football team coach turned Alabama senator has indicated he will maintain the blockade even in the wake of Hamas’ assault on Israel, in which at least 700 mostly civilians are thought to have died, including several hundred revelers killed at a music festival, while dozens more people are believed to have been taken hostage. Israel has responded with airstrikes on the Gaza Strip that authorities in the penned-in territory say has killed at least 493 Palestinian people, including entire families sheltering in their apartments.

US military appointments currently in limbo include top officers slated to command American forces in the Middle East as well as two picks for the joint chiefs of staff. Separately, the US also does not have an ambassador to Israel, its close ally, with Democrats calling for a swift confirmation of the nominee, Jack Lew.

Joe Biden has previously called Tuberville’s stance “totally irresponsible”, and the president accused him of undermining the strength and capabilities of the US military. But the Alabama senator said on Sunday that even the attack on Israel would not shift his position.

“The Pentagon clearly thinks forcing taxpayers to facilitate abortion is more important than confirming their top nominees without a vote,” a Tuberville spokesperson told NBC. “They could end this situation today by dropping their illegal and immoral policy and get everyone confirmed rapidly, but they refuse.”

Invoking a name Tuberville calls himself because of his prior job, the spokesperson added: “If the Biden administration wants their nominees confirmed then Senate Democrats can do what Coach just did in September and file a cloture petition to force a vote.”

Military nominees are usually bundled together and confirmed by a voice vote in the Senate to speed along appointments but under the senate’s rules a single senator can hold up this process. Chuck Schumer, the Democratic Senate majority leader, has said that individual votes on each of the nominees would eat up a huge amount of time and urged Republicans to get Tuberville “in line”.

Tuberville objects to a Pentagon policy that does not itself perform abortions but provides time off and travel assistance to members of the military that require reproductive healthcare.

The US secretary of defense, Lloyd Austin, has said that the policy safeguards the healthcare and combat readiness of service members and is widely popular within the military.

Abortion has been effectively banned in several states following the US supreme court’s decision to overturn the longstanding Roe v Wade precedent last year – a move decried by progressives but lauded by conservatives like Tuberville.

“The severity of the crisis in Israel underscores the foolishness of senator Tuberville’s blockade,” said Jack Reed, a Democrat who leads the Senate armed services committee.

“The United States needs seamless military leadership in place to handle dangerous situations like this and senator Tuberville is denying it. This is no time for petty political theater, and I again urge Republican colleagues to help actively end senator Tuberville’s damaging blockade.”

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Every conservative is complicit. Every one of them supports this blockage. We should only refer to this as a conservative block and not a Tuberville block.

      • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        They're conservatives in the Wilhoit sense:

        "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition … There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” --Frank Wilhoit"

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Definitely. Tuberville, who is safe in Alabama, gives a convenient out for every other conservative Senator. Make no mistake, they support Tuberville.

    • roguetrick@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      64
      ·
      1 year ago

      If the Democrats brought up a rules change vote and it failed, you could make that argument. Since they won't bother with that since they can make political hay out of this themselves, who really cares.

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It's completely normal to not bring a vote when you know you don't have the support to pass. It would be a waste of time.

        • roguetrick@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          55
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It's very naive to believe that is the case here. There's been no attempt to even drum up the support for a vote(they'd likely succeed with that btw). The Dems like this sideshow.

          Edit: to quote Chuck

          “The bottom line is, this is a problem created by Republicans, and it’s up to them to solve it,” he told reporters. “We’re not going to shift the burden to Democrats.”

          • pahlimur@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            36
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No, they just aren't as stupid and unorganized as Republicans. They can do basic math and have discussions in good faith so they know it's not worth bringing it to a vote they know will fail. You are expecting them to be chest pounding idiots when you know they aren't.

            • roguetrick@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              25
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So why did they bring the rules change for the filibuster and not this exactly? I don't see how anyone could argue this in good faith.