• Rodeo@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So that you can get paid less and still have to shoulder all the blame?

    C levels don't have to take responsibility except when it makes them look good.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      in my practical experience, thats not the case. it may be the case at $10B+ companies, but at <$99MM companies it's still much safer to draw a salary.

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What a strange statement.

        $10B+ companies, but at <$99MM

        What about companies between $100m and $9.99b?

        it's still much safer to draw a salary.

        But ceos do pay themselves salaries.

        This barely even makes sense and I really don't get what point you're trying to make.

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was just casually commenting that I don't want to be in charge of a company because I'd rather the risk be on someone else's shoulder, and then when it was implied CEOs take no risk I clarified that the type of immune to failure CEO you're talking about are different from the average business.