Summary

Donald Trump is considering privatizing the US Postal Service due to its financial losses, a move that could disrupt shipping and push hundreds of thousands of federal workers out of government.

Citing the USPS’s financial losses, Trump argued the agency should not rely on government subsidies.

While his specific privatization plans remain unclear, Trump previously clashed with the USPS during his first term, attempting to shift control of key functions like labor relations and rate-setting to the Treasury Department.

This move could significantly alter the structure and operations of the USPS if implemented.

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    159
    ·
    8 days ago

    For fuck’s sake, it’s not meant to make money, it’s a public service - it’s literally in the name!

    I wish more countries governments would get their head out of their capitalistic arses and understand that the services they run aren’t meant to be profitable - that’s what taxes are meant to be for!

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      8 days ago

      You’re going to have to get with the times. Everything has to make money or it’s scrapped including us.

            • rumba@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 days ago

              I just need to know if it’s '80s wrestler, clergyman, or motorcycle club, I don’t really mind in any case I just need to know what voice to read it in…

              • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                Hmm of those choices I’m going with motorcycle club. It’s the closest for sure.

                I can probably pull off 80s wrestler in a pinch.

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 days ago

        I’m no economist but at some point doesn’t that fall apart? If everything needs to be generating then aren’t we creating a vacuum at the bottom or whatever? Money has to come in and go out equally in the end, no?

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          It does, and that’s manifested in increasing labour requirements, and consumer spending.

          The US solves it by using slaves and debt.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 days ago

          The model has to change once you reach the vacuum state. Usually via violent implosion.