• fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    1 year ago

    Two pieces of technology are behind the Internet as we know it today.

    Neither one is patented.

    They are TCP/IP and Linux.

    All the network traffic runs over TCP/IP.

    95%+ of the servers run Linux. So do the Android phones and Chromebooks.

    Clearly, patent protection in software is not required for society to benefit greatly from technological innovation in software.

    • PixxlMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Linux isn't a patentable thing. It's not one idea or even really a new one. I agree with your premise though. Patents, in nearly all cases, suck.

      • fubo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Linux isn’t a patentable thing.

        Yes, that's been true so far. Are you sure it's true under the newly proposed law?

        • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I hope if the law passes, that the Linux Foundation immediately would jump on putting a patent on Linux/whatever else needed just to keep those pesky patent mongoloids from trying to kill Linux. Assuming that Linux would become patentable.

        • PixxlMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What would you patent? "A program which handles low level functionality and manages other programs?" I suppose what I mean is that there is "prior art". You can't patent something if it isn't new and the concept of Linux isn't. Linux isn't the first kernel. This law wouldn't change that. The first person to create a kernel though, under this law that might perhaps (?) have been patentable. Which would've crippled the entire software industry in it's infancy. Yay patents!

      • fubo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        "TCP/IP" is conventionally used to indicate the whole protocol suite; including UDP, ICMP and sometimes even ARP.

        • winky88@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Technically the parent protocol is IP.

          In all my years I have never heard someone suggest that TCP is a catch all term.

          • Parodper@foros.fediverso.gal
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I've seen many references to TCP/IP as meaning IP + everything-on-top, usually when talking about other networking technologies like UUnet, OSI, etc. Also as the TCP/IP stack, usually meaning the (Free)BSD networking code used in other systems.

          • fubo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It's not that TCP is a catch-all term, but "TCP/IP" is often used that way.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_protocol_suite

            The Internet protocol suite, commonly known as TCP/IP, is a framework for organizing the set of communication protocols used in the Internet and similar computer networks according to functional criteria. The foundational protocols in the suite are the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), the User Datagram Protocol (UDP), and the Internet Protocol (IP).

            For that matter, the classic networking text by Douglas Comer is Internetworking with TCP/IP and it does cover UDP, ICMP, ARP, DHCP, DNS, etc.