Puerto Ricans cannot vote in general elections despite being U.S. citizens, but they can exert a powerful influence with relatives on the mainland. Phones across the island of 3.2 million people were ringing minutes after the speaker derided the U.S. territory Sunday night, and they still buzzed Monday.

Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris is competing with Trump to win over Puerto Rican communities in Pennsylvania and other swing states. Shortly after stand-up comic Tony Hinchcliffe said that, “I don’t know if you guys know this, but there’s literally a floating island of garbage in the middle of the ocean right now. I think it’s called Puerto Rico,” Puerto Rican reggaeton superstar Bad Bunny announced he was backing Harris.

After Sunday’s rally, a senior adviser for the Trump campain, Danielle Alvarez, said in a statement that Hinchcliffe’s joke did “not reflect the views of President Trump or the campaign.”

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Reminder: The only reason Puerto Ricans cannot vote is because Republicans refuse to recognize it as a state, and they do that because they don’t want brown people to vote, and they don’t want brown people to vote because they don’t want them to exist.

    • NotBillMurray@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Hear me out here, turn Puerto Rico into a state and combine both north and south Dakota into a new state called “One big Dakota”. We wouldn’t even need to change the flag, and the population of one big Dakota might break 5 digits.

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      13 hours ago

      As much as I hate the GOP, Puerto Rico has never attempted to apply for statehood. Their referendums on the subject have never shown a large enough amount of support for them to try a real vote. They’re typically around a 50-50 split.

      • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        13 hours ago

        State or not I think its pretty ridiculous that they are american citizens but can’t vote for president of the united states… People living in DC get to vote and aren’t living in a state.

        • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 hours ago

          But they choose to not. One of those cake and eat it too scenarios.

          A territory like them is eligible for Federal money from various programs, while not having to pay Federal income tax. If they became a state, they’d then have to pay income tax, lose benefit of the free program money, but be allowed to vote.

          If you don’t want to fully commit to the whole package and are milking the advantages of being a territory, should you really get a right to choose how the package that is being taxed and giving you free money is steered?

          (Oversimplification, of course.)

          If I were a member of a territory, I don’t really know where my thoughts would land.

          However, as one that is taxed, it seems that allowing the untaxed to choose our taxed destiny would be disingenuous.

        • mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Only citizens residing in a state for the majority of the year can vote for federal elections. Basically you need a senator to vote federally. Hawaii and all other states were the same way when they too were territories. All PR needs to do is vote for statehood and then I guess the political shitshow starts as well as flag redesign.

          • wolfpack86@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            You aren’t correct. https://www.fvap.gov/citizen-voter/voting-residence

            You generally need to have established residency in a state at some point in your life, but there is zero requirement to spend any time there if you live abroad in order to retain your voting rights. Several states allow children who have been born overseas the right to vote at their parents last US address.

            However, because Puerto Rico is part of the United States, residents there (even if you retired there after living in New York your entire life) fall under the rules for Puerto Rico.

            So, you can live in Mexico as a US Citizen, permanently, and retain voting rights in your last state… Or you can live in Puerto Rico and lose the ability to vote for president.

          • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Except we made an exception for citizens that reside in Washington DC. They have no representative in the senate, but were given 3 electoral college votes for president and vice president.

            So we totally can (and have) extended the right to vote to citizens living outside one of the 50 states to vote, we just won’t for Puerto Rico. :(

      • smeenz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        What are the main reasons they have for not voting in favour of statehood?