• BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Immigrant labor is actually cheaper when immigration is tightly controlled, at least it is in the US where “restricted” really just means more illegal immigrants rather than fewer overall. When you let people in legally, they’re documented, unions can actually reach out to them, and they are protected by things like minimum wage.

    Illegal immigrants are not.

    • WamGams@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Something like 70% of “illegals” in the US are illegally here for less than half the year. It’s agricultural workers who just don’t go home when the season ends.

      These people do nothing to harm the 7% of private employees who are already in unions.

    • mommykink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m talking about the best interests of existing union workers.

      Have you spoken to many on-the-ground union workers?

      When you let people in legally, they’re documented, unions can actually reach out to them, and they are protected by things like minimum wage.

      This is exactly what those people are opposed to. They want their Unions to be exclusive with a small labor pool. Less workers + good Union support = more money per worker. There are obviously some exceptions.

      • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Fewer legal immigrants doesn’t mean fewer workers, it just means fewer people being paid above board. That extra money doesn’t go to union members, it goes to stock buybacks and CEO packages. The more of a company’s workforce is part of the union, the stronger the union’s negotiating position, and THAT’S how unions get more money for their members.