A BBC investigation reveals that Microsoft is permanently banning Palestinians in the U.S. and other countries who use Skype to call relatives in Gaza.

    • suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      They didn’t fuck up, they made a design choice about the scope of the app. Are they also fucking up by not blurring the messages on screen? After all someone could be looking over your shoulder without you realizing it. Maybe Signal should ship with spyglasses.

      • Feyd@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        You’re absolutely right and it’s insane I keep coming across these wild takes from people that clearly don’t understand technology

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m not sure why you think anyone would want a messenger that touts itself for its encryption to not encrypt things.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            Then it’s weird they are fixing it now. Why aren’t they insisting this doesn’t need to be dealt with because it was a feature, not a bug?

            • suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              4 months ago

              It’s weird that apps sometimes change scope and add features that users want? Ones that contributers already did most of the work for?

              Why aren’t they insisting this doesn’t need to be dealt with because it was a feature, not a bug?

              That was literally what they have been saying this whole fucking time.

              “The database key was never intended to be a secret. At-rest encryption is not something that Signal Desktop is currently trying to provide or has ever claimed to provide,” responded the Signal employee.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                Did they make an intentional design choice which users should have been okay with like you said the first time or is this a feature users wanted? It can’t be both.

            • subignition@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              It’s really fucking annoying how relentlessly you pick fights with people these days. Wish you’d chill out dude.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                Or I’m just speaking my mind and you don’t agree.

                And aren’t you picking as fight with me right now?

                • subignition@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Not picking a fight; don’t really care what you have to say in response. Just needed to share my observation that you are latching onto people in a really aggressive manner in multiple threads as of late. If that doesn’t bother you then go ahead and disregard.

                • sunzu@kbin.run
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  You are right to bringing up this issue and it is pretty fucking big deal inho mistakes happen but signal “leadership” has made series of questionable choice which don’t quite align with the user base.

                  Other person is down playing it hard too. Hard to tell why as he is not really providing any good reason besides trying to “explain” it away

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        That wouldn’t shock me, but he was right that Signal was not addressing a known vulnerability. In fact, denying that it even was a vulnerability.

        For what it’s worth, I trust Telegram even less than Signal. And at least Signal seems to be finally doing something about the problem.

    • cum@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Damn that’s bad, and Signal’s response was even worse. They knew about it in 2018, for 6 years.

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I always felt like signal is there more to satisfy a niche so people feel like their whatsapp is good enough.

        Leadership makes some odd chocies IMHO