• Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    Latimer claimed, on CNN, that over 50% of his funding was from people in the district, while over 90% of Bowman’s was from outside. Couldn’t get Bowman’s response to that because he declined CNN’s invite to appear. Is that what Dems need - pols who can’t be bothered to appear on major cable networks?

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Latimer claimed, on CNN, that over 50% of his funding was from people in the district

      Local headquarters or not, AIPAC represents Israel, NOT Bronx.

      while over 90% of Bowman’s was from outside.

      Gonna need a source on that. The ass of a conservative Zionist genocide enabler doesn’t count.

      Couldn’t get Bowman’s response to that because he declined CNN’s invite to appear.

      Probably has better things to with his time than fend off the bad faith questions of billionaire-owned media

      Is that what Dems need - pols who can’t be bothered to appear on major cable networks?

      Much better than a corrupt genocide enabler at any rate.

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        If you screech genocide or Zionist enough times you don’t win, but in fact you lose.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          If you screech protect genocide or Zionist and Zionism enough times you don’t win. 8n fact you In fact we all lose.

          There, fixed it for you. You want another boot to lick or have you had your fill for the day?

                  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Your agnst drives stupidity. So you take a totally valid criticism of a candidate who lost and make it all about your current Cause célèbre, one which you are aware of only on a surface level. Why you think I would have any interest in that I do not know, yet here we are.