• Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    10 months ago

    I wouldn’t say it’s insane for a republican to be racist. Obviously racist? Sure. But not insane.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I think sanity or Insanity is linked to being mentally abnormal, not normal, while this disappointing behavior and state of mind is pretty normal.

        I don’t consider racism abnormal since it’s so common, or a mental illness; racism is a frightened, prejudiced reaction to differences.

        Offensive and unwelcome, but very common in a normal state of mind.

        I guess you could say the rant was insane, because he doesn’t seem to understand the consequences of being so openly racist.

        But it isn’t like you have to be in a mental institution to hear a racist rant.

  • TheCelticPirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yes, what he said was way out of line and he should apologize like she said. But paying your husband with campaign funds to be your personal security is a little weird, right?

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      10 months ago

      Which is why her funding is already being investigated. His comments are completely unnecessary.

      • ZeroCool@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Exactly. She’s rightly being investigated and she deserves to be criticized for what at best, seems like a conflict of interest for employing her husband, but she should not be subjected to racist attacks. Troy Nehls is just a bigoted piece of garbage looking for an excuse to go on a racist rant to score some easy points with his racist constituents.

    • 800XL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      10 months ago

      Less weird then hiring your 2 sons and your daughter to high ranking gov positions. At least he has an interest in the actual job and isn’t there to fleece the taxpayers.

      • Endorkend@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I was wondering about that.

        Did they actually ever get security clearance?

        The issue seemed to be that they couldn’t (due to clear links to questionable money sources and contacts) and still got all the sensitive info.

        • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A White House whistleblower has said the Trump administration overruled security experts to give questionable security clearances to more than two dozen people, including the president’s daughter Ivanka and son-in-law Jared Kushner.

          Tricia Newbold, a White House security adviser, told Democrats in Congress that clearances were initially denied to dozens of administration officials because of concerns over possible foreign influence, conflicts of interests, questionable or criminal conduct, financial problems or drug abuse.

          She said President Donald Trump’s former White House personnel security director, Carl Kline, personally overruled the career officials’ judgements in the cases of two senior officials.

          https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN1RD2PD/

          • Endorkend@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            So there’s really no point to the review process considering it can be overridden and it doesn’t even take the President himself to do it.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It’s hard to imagine he’s providing competent service as a protective agent, though it may be more that he’s simply managing her detail, etc.

      It’s usually a bad idea to have friends/intimate relations as body guards. For one thing, any attempted assassination or whatever is going to account for your security detail, which means whoever is going to have a target on their back. It exposes him to increased risks.

      For another, if he’s busy being a husband (and presumably a father,), he’s not busy being a body guard.

      But he’s probably just managing the staff, meeting them, reviewing their backgrounds etc, making sure their personalities “fit”,

      Regardless it’s pretty normal to give families consultant fees all the freaking time.