you sound so weak because your straw men are based on demonstrably false assumptions.

again, if you support genocide, that is your own problem, don’t project your violent and strange prejudices. onto others.

blaming other people for your own anxieties is an ineffective coping mechanism.

Your implied confirmation that an uninformed mob as moral arbiter could not be more timely.

enjoy that bandwagon; people downvoting uncomfortable truths doesn’t make them any less true.

ha, truth. they sound nuts

you’ll probably notice that every person arguing against “centrists” as if they aren’t centrist is very proud of their refusal to provide evidence for their arguments or read any articles refuting their mistakes.

“Netanyahu is committing genocide and we are wrong to sell him weapons.”

I’ve already responded to that in the first comments, which part are you confused about?

“I didn’t say you can’t read”

cool, nobody said you did.

“you might have to admit that genocide is wrong.”

If you don’t think genocide is wrong, that is your issue, don’t blame it on some vague “other” that you don’t understand or agree with.

you making mistakes and avoiding corrective information doesn’t mean other people can’t read.

you are wrong.

“Just because you like it, that doesn’t mean it’s not support.”

who told you that liking things means you don’t support those things?

your runarounds are bonkers and inaccurate.

slow down and organize your thoughts, they don’t make no sense.

“Centrists will never admit this…”

centrists, and most people now, agree with both of those things, what are you talking about?

you have a non-argument.

you’re trying to rile up anger by safely condemning the imaginary offenses of a vague minority that you likely belong to.

“If any centrist wants to admit that supporting genocide”

centrists don’t support genocide, and if you think otherwise then you clearly don’t know anything about what’s happening in Palestine or in your own country.

“For the first time.”

you got to read some books. articles, watch an interview or two.

If you are unaware of what’s happening and what people are saying, that is your fault, not some vague political minority that you’re ascribing your insecurities and ignorance to.

no crows will land on you, straw man.

200 million examples of free speech, according to the Supreme Court.

I’m sure the room is real, but that is not the average.

That is a very nice Swedish dining room.

that’s great to hear, congratulations!

you also mention that we don’t know the extent of the voter fraud that occurred, that there certainly was voter fraud, that exaggerated claims of voter fraud are not widespread.

and then the conclusion is to be careful of “conspiracies”.

that doesn’t track.

1. we’re not sure how much of the rainforest corporations have destroyed.

2. We know that corporations have certainly destroyed large parts of the rainforest.

3. therefore, if you hear people talking about corporations destroying too much rainforest, it might develop into a dangerous conspiracy, so report it for disinformation?

no.

voter suppression is and has been a real and significant problem, people should be aware of it. reporting hyperbolic disinformation should be a supportive paragraph to this point, not the conclusion or title, especially when violent calls to action are not a problem on the democratic side…

as you say, hyperbolic claims only manifest sporadically on a couple message boards.

that is not the same as an entire political party simultaneously claiming that their election was stolen and then violently attacking the capitol and the two should not be correlated.

“check to see if the information is accurate” is better advice.

All the way back to bush, conservatives were ramping up removing voting machines from minority and blue districts, purging voter registrations, challenging cosmetic scuffs on ballots, and they did the same thing this election.

votes being attacked and blocked definitely happened, and thousands of votes were blocked in most states that were perfectly legal, but it doesn’t stop conservatives from challenging their validity.

it doesn’t have to be labeled a “conspiracy” if it is a fact.

conservatives can’t win purely on numbers anymore, so they focus on dividing and disqualifying democratic voters.

blocked legal ballots:

https://www.turnto23.com/politics/america-votes/pennsylvania-election-officials-tackling-challenges-to-mail-ballots

purged voter rolls:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-allows-virginia-purge-noncitizens-voter-rolls-ahead-elec-rcna177673

https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/20/politics/attempts-to-purge-voter-rolls-increase-as-election-nears/index.html

yeah, at least that dude cared.

very idiocracy.

everyone say goodbye to the wonderful decadess of lean, efficient, bloat-free Microsoft software we have known and loved up until 2024!

yep, that is good to throw in.

I try to keep these as specific as I can, because as soon as I mention more than one item in the same sentence, the conservative arguing with me is like “so first he reduced inflation, then he also reduced prescription drug prices? which is it? choose one!”

presidents can actually do more than one thing-

"Last year biden said he was 80!

this year Biden says he’s 81!

what’s the real number?"

High five.

it seems like Americans watched the South Park episode about Trump and Hillary, assumed it was the factual, comprehensive truth about all politics everywhere forever, and then never looked at any of the facts ever again.

The democrats reduce inflation.

The Republicans force women to die in hospital parking lots.

democrats fund civil rights advocacy groups.

The Republicans make memes about murdering senators.

Democrats significantly increase the value of the US dollar and lower unemployment

The leader of the Republicans is a rapist.