Link: https://nitter.net/TeamFortressS2/status/1745157814295617767

Valve is generally supportive of mods (hell, a Portal 2 mod was just released a few days ago) but it seems like recreating Team Fortress 2 was pushing it… Really sad, honestly. I really hope Valve would just strike a deal with these devs and make it official rather than throw away the insane amount of effort they put into re-building TF2.

  • Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Makes me wonder where their line is between this and Black Mesa, though.

    • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      1 year ago

      Black Mesa is a remake of a single player game that Valve wasn’t planning on remaking any time soon, more profitable to make it official and take a cut

      TF2 actively still makes them sht tons of money, no profit in splitting the fan base

    • Vespair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Imo, Trademark. Black Mesa is a concept from Half-Life, but “Black Mesa” to the best of my knowledge wasn’t a registered trademark. “Team Fortress/Team Fortress 2” are registered trademarks however, and that significantly changes the value and functionality of the specific terms.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That would only allow them the name, not the content. They always had to get Valve’s permission.

        • Vespair@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, but it’s easier to give permission to use concepts that don’t infringe on trademark than it is to give permission on something that could be argued in court as muddying a trademark.

          I know they require permission either way, but what permission they’re actually asking for changes based on what terminology they use

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Well my point is that since the content is directly related, it actually doesn’t matter what they called it. It would’ve been exactly the same amount of infringement if they called it, “happy fun times at the science lab”.

            The only differnce is it would’ve been less obvious to identify.

            • Vespair@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I get your point, my point is the infringement would be less egregious without trademark and thus easier for Valve to turn a blind eye to, or even potentially officially endorse via some potential deal à la Black Mesa.

              But hey, I am fully willing to concede that I am just a layman with enormous distance from this topic and no specific expertise or insider knowledge, so the possibility of me being wrong is high

    • Mountaineer@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d guess the fine line is “Valve intend to earn money from something official in the future”