That story explains why I dislike led lights

    • littlewonder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love that I get this reference.

      I also love that last year he found a company manufacturing strings of white LEDs with colored tips (which is his ideal setup) and said he probably wouldn’t need to make any more annual videos about it anymore.

      Cue this year’s video about it lol

    • ✋😐

      I grew up with incandescent bulbs, and it was hell. The waste, in both trash and energy consumption, was horrendous.

      The (thankfully) short age of flourescent reduced energy use, but the trash was worse, and the light categorically regressive.

      LEDs are, in all ways, superior. You buy cheap-ass crap LEDs, you’re going to get a worse experience, obviously. Despite some negatives, LEDs are still the best lighting technology available. Feel free to complain, but there’s no better option right now. Wanting to go back to incandescents is vinyl-turntable-level, selective memory, retro hipsterism. And also super shitty for the environment.

  • Matt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    But did you read the story? It doesn’t discourage use of LED products. The issue is specific LEDs that are manufactured with sub par components that contribute to flicker. Unfortunately it’s the only thing regulation will solve. Personally I’m waiting for headlights to be regulated for glare, position, and color temperature.

  • toast@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can too often see the same thing in LED car headlights and tail lights. The most obnoxious of these flicker noticeably all the time. Not much better are the ones that seem to be on continuously when viewed in the center of your vision, but flicker in your peripheral vision. The later I find really distracting

    • Zanz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can’t recall seeing any legal head or tail lights that have flickering issues. We will hopefully see this issue less and less as people are no longer allowed to buy the illegal retrofit kits from places that sell headlights. We’ve seen a lot less people running the Sylvania super bright off-road lights now that you’re not allowed to buy them from the headlight section of an auto parts store and online stores are not allowed to sell them without off-road use popup warnings.

      I really wish that instead of useless trash like drunk driver checkpoints midweek we would start seeing headlight inspection points or other vehicle inspection points to check for safety issues like these; if we’re going to keep having these checkpoints for no reason.

    • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      On digital rear view mirrors you can really see the flicker on some headlights and DRL because of the framerate of the camera. Most cars are fine but some aftermarket headlights and GMC/Chevy(IIRC) are very noticable.

  • Rob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thank, NPR, for mentioning migraines as one of the problems.

    Now do an article on flickering, eye-piercing, migraine-inducing LED lights on emergency vehicles and crosswalks.

    • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If there are any lights that are understandably bright, it’s those on emergency vehicles.

      The bright-ass LED lights on liften trucks though are entirely infuriating.

      • Rob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not the brightness that’s the problem. It’s the sharpness and the strobe. Back in the old days, when they were spinning lights, they were nice and bright and got the job done just fine without those two aspects.

        • boeman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hell, even as annoying as the xenon strobes were, they were never anywhere near as disorienting as the LED strobes on the emergency vehicles now. That and the low sound range sirens… They make me nauseous when they pass close by.

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The lack of warmth is the color of LEDs, they are based on blues and no reds because of cost and efficiency. In places where you get a lot of sun in the US (Arizona, Southern Cali, etc.), I bet the blues are loved.

        • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          27
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think you understand the basics of lighting fabrication from that statement and those color temperatures are misleading.

            • Matt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              Most LEDs are based on a “blue pump”, which means the chip produces a lot of intensity in the blue wavelength range. Color temperatures are produced by adding more phosphor to the chip surface. The phosphor only allows certain wavelengths of color through, and the more phosphor added means the LED will appear warmer in color. More phosphor means more expensive though, which is why lots of LEDs are produced in the 7 to 5k range. Even when adding more phosphor to the chip and having a warmer color temperature, there is still blue light being produced and that can impact your sensitivity. Companies such as BIOS Lighting produce chips that don’t use a blue pump. Long story short, it’s a really complicated field that is long overdue for multiple layers of government regulation.

            • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              There are a lot of good articles about it. Explained in a rudimentary way, it’s super hard to make good reds for LED and has been a problem since its inception. OLEDs use little organic red pixels and the blacks turn off all light instead of replicating a black. It’s super interesting. When I was in school, they brought a major LED inventor to show us what they had, it wasn’t good quality light at the time and for a long time afterwards. OLED was the first time I saw good reds. If you go to a costco, look at the difference between the reds on the same pic, can you tell there is a difference or does it all look sort of magenta? That’s how you can tell if it’s a good OLED or not. To be fair though, you can mess with the settings to make it look shitty which some stores do to sell more of a certain type of tv.

      • geogle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        My reds on my Christmas lights are not comforting either… Oh, and I live in the South with plenty of sunlight…

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not so much the LEDs themselves, as the cheaply designed power supply.

    • Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Actually yes! I got some this year and they’re fantastic. Aside from the fact that they don’t get hot, they are indistinguishable to my eye from incandescent C7s.

      • psycotica0@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ooh! That’s great to hear! A real glowing review… I’ll probably snag some before next Christmas!

  • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    what a fucking boring world we’ve made. Flashing lights give people seizures and shit, but sure, we can just pretend that’s not a problem and make all the lights flicker instead of learning how to make an LED dimmer. Fuck it! Obviously nothing matters anyway. That’s what we as a society are apparently saying. Woo, capitalism.

    • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You know incandescent bulbs flicker, right? Same with CRTs. The bulbs flicker at ~60Hz. CRTs at ~30 fps.

      I’m not saying flickering isn’t a problem but don’t act like things didn’t flicker before.

      • uid0gid0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fluorescent lights are the absolute worst with the flickering, and they have been around for decades. I actually prefer LEDs because they seem to be able to output a wider range of light, instead of making everything look yellow, which is where the “warm glow” comes from.

      • Incandescent bulbs don’t visibly immediately transition to a harsh on/off state like LEDs do when operating at the same frequency.

        Incandescent bulbs are still burning and emitting light during that brief period of “off” time, and CRTs have a similar “effect” that allow the interlaced lines to display smoothly on the screen AFAIK, although I will admit CRT flicker is much more noticeable

  • Billy_Gnosis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I still use the old school ceramic C9 bulbs. So much better. They give off a warm colorful feeling. Led lights just feel cold to me.

  • Blackout@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I buy the cheap $3 boxes of colored lights. They aren’t that bright and give a nice warm color to a room

  • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Couldn’t work out for months why I got a blinding headache on a building site at about 2pm every day in winter, until spring came and we didn’t need the LED work lamps any more

    This shit is definitely real

  • AlecSadler@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    About 75% of LED monitors give me a headache because I can see or “feel” then flickering. It sucks.

    I had a coworker back in the in-office days who had these garbage-ass monitors and whenever I had to pair with him I’d end up with a debilitating headache.

      • Synthead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        LCD monitors don’t flicker at their refresh rate. It simply updates the graphics on the panel per frame at an imperceptible speed. The backlight has nothing to do with the refresh, either.

        • poke@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          This isn’t true for all of them. Some have a backlight strobing feature that flashes the display at their current refresh rate to reduce motion blur. It makes the strobing much worse at lower refresh rates, though.

    • Akuchimoya@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have sensitivity to certain lighting and find amber glasses help me a lot. I don’t know if it’s the same as your issue, but it’s be worth trying. I first tried it with a pair of $10 clip ons I bought at the hardware store. They were meant for highlighting contrast for outdoor activities. One since gotten prescription glasses with amber lenses for work.

      • GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Theraspecs have various tints as well! I wear rose-tinted (FL41) lenses that were specifically designed to help with light sensitivity and photo phobia. Since changing to a rose lens, I can make it through a day at work with flourescent lights and through a 2 hour music rehearsal at a school with flourescent lights, whereas that would be exhausting before and cause headaches.

    • Kage520@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is there a good eink monitor yet? I think I saw boox made one but I was not sure it was large enough or useful yet.

  • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This article seems sus to me. It describes a bunch of ways to observe high-frequency flicker that, IME, just aren’t a problem. Personally I find flicker stops being a problem above about 60 Hz. I’m sure the threshold varies for different people, but I can’t fathom how anyone could be bothered by a 2000 Hz flicker as the article seems to suggest.

    Also, for reference, back before first screen TVs, TVs all flickered at 50 or 60 Hz depending on what country you were in.

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love how you decided it doesn’t exist because you personally don’t notice. Lighting design is a thing.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is like those people who don’t get headaches and nausea when they watch 3D movies telling people who do get headaches and nausea from watching 3D movies that “it’s not that bad!”

      • Beardedsausag3@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        They stated “IME” and “personally”, understanding thresholds vary per person… but you gloss over that just to try and create an argument. I bet you have blue hair.

        • sbv@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The upthread comment says:

          but I can’t fathom how anyone could be bothered by a 2000 Hz flicker as the article seems to suggest.

          What does this part of your comment mean?

          I bet you have blue hair.

          • 9point6@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            What does this part of your comment mean?

            It’s actually a helpful notice to disregard everything they’ve said.

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      You could hear a 2kHz flicker. It would hurt my head for that reason. I also have certain monitors and earbuds that I can hear the power led and hate it.

    • cybervseas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even a 2kHz rate can be a problem when the implementation is cheap and you get weird harmonics that distort the PWM and might create lower frequency flicker. I’m thinking interactions between cheap power supply voltage/current ripple and LED PWM. I personally don’t know enough about this kind of LED implementation to say what could or couldn’t be happening.

    • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Personally I find flicker stops being a problem above about 60 Hz.

      The standard AC frequency in the U.S. is 60 Hz, so…