No, of course not. They know it should be $40 Billion. That could never be permitted.
40 Billion isn't enough either, they've literally poisoned the entire planet and every human on it with PFAS.
Okie dokie, $40 Trillion it is.
Sadly, never an option.
Never say never.
You know who also poisoned the planet? The plants. Yup. That oxygen shit made the planet flammable. Asshole plants.
(Just joking; but yeah, fucking forever chemicals)
The thing is 0² is quite reactive and the bonds are usually pretty easy to break. Compare that to fluorine-carbon bonds and you'll see why this is an issue.
Well, oxygen is going nowhere too. So, yeah, I see why it is an issue.
Hell yeah, about time for a wave of similar lawsuits to force a crackdown on forever chemicals.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to review a $40 million verdict against E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co, preserving a legal win for an Ohio man who said toxic "forever chemicals" released by the company into drinking water caused his cancer.
For the Lemmy Brain jumping to conclusions.
Obviously DuPont competitors own the court and want a consistent legal framework where their own chemical use isn’t investigated too closely.
/s
"Supreme Court bought by Dupont, will not review their masters bad doing"
Fix that for you Reuters.
Dupont was appealing to get it reduced, though. If the Supreme Court was on their side, they would have taken the appeal.
Whenever the Supreme Court won't take a case, it's important to see why. It always defers to a lower court's ruling. And a lot of the time it's the opposite of what you may think, which is good in the end.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to review a $40 million verdict against E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co, preserving a legal win for an Ohio man who said toxic "forever chemicals" released by the company into drinking water caused his cancer.
[…]
The 6th Circuit upheld the lower court’s decision, finding it was right to conclude that DuPont’s behavior impacted the plaintiffs in virtually identical ways, so it was appropriate to bar the company from relitigating arguments it had repeatedly lost before.
In this case, refusing to review the case protected the win for the plaintiff and shut down DuPont's attempt to avoid paying.
Of course, Thomas and Kavanaugh did some brown-nosing for their corporate overlords:
Dissenting from the high court's decision not to grant review, Justice Clarence Thomas said Monday the bellwether trials were not meant to be representative of all the cases in the multidistrict litigation, and DuPont should not have been barred from contesting elements of negligence found in those earlier cases.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh said he would have heard the case.
Kavanaugh was probably getting boofed by DuPont, hopefully with some pfas.
