• murtaza64@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    It looks like it's not an actual height difference, but the smaller width makes the second i look significantly smaller than the first, also implying a lower height.

    • OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      True, they are the exact same height. Holy optical illusion, Batman!

      I suppose this is part of what makes font design so difficult.

    • jeffhykin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Welp, another reason I will absolutely not be using glyph-streching or whatever Microsoft called it.