• someguy3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    SteamOS Holo" 64-bit is the most popular reported, at just over 42 percent of the Linux slice of pie.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Apple’s macOS has been the second most popular operating system on the Steam game distribution platform for a long time, but that has now changed.

    Linux has surpassed macOS for the number two spot, according to Steam’s July user hardware survey.

    Steam regularly asks its users to give an anonymized look at their hardware, and the company makes the information it gathers available each month.

    The Steam Deck was first released a while ago, but it only became widely available without a waiting list last October.

    It worked with game publishers to see high-profile releases like Resident Evil Village and No Man’s Sky in recent months, and those games run pretty well on modern Macs—certainly better than similar titles on Intel-based Macs with integrated graphics chips.

    It also announced a new gaming porting tool in an upcoming version of macOS that works in some ways like Proton, as seen on the Steam Deck.


    I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, it’s simpler than that.

      1. most gamers use Windows
      2. macOS requires special support (Metal + 64-bit)
      3. most Windows games work on Linux through Proton

      Developers go where the money is, and that is Windows. To support Linux, they don’t need to do anything. To support Steam Deck, they usually don’t need to do anything, except maybe adjust text size based on screen resolution. That’s it. To support macOS, they need to support a completely different rendering pipeline, ensure all of their dependencies support 64-bit, and now potentially target ARM (Rosetta, the x86 -> ARM layer can have a big performance penalty). Also, Macs don’t have very powerful GPUs, so even if they do support macOS, the bigger titles will probably run poorly anyway.

      So what are they going to do, put a ton of dev resources to properly support macOS, or put one guy for a couple weeks to support Steam Deck/Linux?

      It has absolutely nothing to do with cost of hardware and everything to do with cost of supporting the platform vs number of potential customers.

      • i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A couple months ago Apple released some code for porting games that supposedly handles having to write custom code specifically for Metal. It’s based on Wine so it seems similar to Proton, but Apple probably wants developers to package their games and get them approved for sale on the app store or whatever instead of having users just running their own games. It looked hastily put together when I checked it out, but I don’t develop for Macs anymore so I haven’t actually used it. It’s too soon to tell if game companies care to port their games and go through retesting that the graphics work using the API translation layers to run on different drivers and hardware.

        • Ananace@lemmy.ananace.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t get the “Game Porting Toolkit” they made, content-wise it basically looks like a regular Wine packaging - much like what Proton is, but then it has one of the strangest licenses I’ve ever seen for something designed to help development and shipping.
          To paraphrase, you can’t include any part of the toolkit with your product. Not the development components, the runtime components, the translation layers, nothing. So good luck using it to actually ship game ports, since that would be a license violation.