When two scientists went looking for fossil fuels beneath the ground of northeastern France, they did not expect to discover something which could supercharge the effort to tackle the climate crisis.
Hydrogen. Saved a click
Thanks. (Clickbait title = article downvoted)
What if the title is bad but the article isn't?
Still shouldn't reward news sites for doing this unless you want more clickbait titles.
If the community allows, posting with a better title is also an option.
Is that a change? I might be confusing things but I thought it had to be the exact title.
I didn't check for this one, some news communities require it, some don't.
Technically white hydrogen and the article explains why that might be important
Oh ye more finite energy sources will save us forever while we're
sawing off the brachfracturing the ground we're sitting on.Also ye the title is shit
Community rules say I have to use the same title. I didn't like the title but I thought the article itself was pretty good.
between 6 million and 250 million - that's a hell of a spread.
Yeah that was one of my least favorite parts of the article. I really wish they said why it couldn't be pegged down more accurately.
Clickbait titles always get me to click… the downvote button.
That's fine. I still think the article itself was pretty good. You're obviously under no obligation to read it.
