• @MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    136 months ago

    It’s a lot more humane than killing them and later finding evidence that the conviction was a mistake. Unless you know a necromancer, keeping the most heinous offenders in prison for life is the most we can do.

    • @Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -2
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I’m against capital punishment but you’re way off track here, missing the forest for the trees lol

      you act like every case could go either way at any time. There are many where their crimes are unquestionable. In that case, is nitrogen more humane than keeping them locked in a box until they die? Sucking up funds that could help actual innocent people in need? That is the point being made here

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        46 months ago

        Once again: it is cheaper to house a prisoner for life than to execute one.

        • @sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          -16 months ago

          It’s only cheaper because of the enormous costs and inefficiencies baked into our justice system. The costs of executing someone come down to court costs, not the tangible resources that the prisoner takes up.

          Funny enough, a lot of these appeals and investigations only cost so much and go on for so long because of the initial poor quality of police actions.

          It’s like being released after 20 years on DNA evidence that was never checked initially, or where someone was convicted of rape but never positively identified by the accuser. A procedural fuckup costs millions blown in court, prison, and settlement costs.

          • @Jagger2097@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            16 months ago

            So your argument is that we should make state sanctioned murder faster and have fewer appeals? Perhaps those low quality Police officers should just be empowered to… oh fuck we already did that