Can’t just be me, can it? Currently 0 for 3 on interviews because I can’t seem to get past the technical interview/test. Usually because of some crazy complicated algorithm question that’s never been relevant to anything I’ve ever had to do on the job in all my years coding.

Also, while I’m ranting: screw the usual non-answer when given feedback.

  • @shagie@programming.dev
    5•10 months ago

    https://www.nspe.org/resources/pe-magazine/may-2018/ncees-ends-software-engineering-pe-exam

    The Software Engineering PE exam, which has struggled to reach an audience, will be discontinued by the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying after the April 2019 administration. The exam has been administered five times, with a total of 81 candidates.

    NCEES’s Committee on Examination Policy and Procedures reviews the history of any exam with fewer than 50 total first-time examinees in two consecutive administrations and makes recommendations to the NCEES Board of Directors about the feasibility of continuing the exam.

    In 2013, the software exam became the latest addition to the family of PE exams. The exam was developed by NSPE, IEEE-USA, the IEEE Computer Society, and the Texas Board of Professional Engineers—a group known as the Software Engineering Consortium. Partnering with NCEES, the consortium began working in 2007 to spread the word about the importance of software engineering licensure for the public health, safety, and welfare.

    • @varsock@programming.dev
      3•10 months ago

      thanks for sharing, didn't know they got rid of it - makes sense though

      from the same article:

      if the boards aren’t regulating the [software engineering profession], it’s tough to get people to take the exam

      Now middle managers and HR are regulating the software engineering profession -_-

      • @shagie@programming.dev
        1•10 months ago

        I looked at it when it came out. The problem is that taking classes back in the early 90s with computer programming - the CS department was an offshoot of the Math and Statistics departments rather than engineering (the engineering department was hardware focused - designing chips and circuit boards)… and so I don't have the deep physics background that the FE exam expects you to have prior to taking the PE exam.

        If I had taken electrical and computer engineering… well, assuming that I got through the math (had to take the CS numerical methods class three times)… maybe. But if people want to complain about the irrelevance of reversing a list or describing two different approaches to balanced trees… they'd probably complain more about being tested on generators and RC frequency response in low pass filters even if you only have to take it once.

        • @varsock@programming.dev
          1•10 months ago

          But if people want to complain about the irrelevance of reversing a list or describing two different approaches to balanced trees… they'd probably complain more about being tested on generators and RC frequency response in low pass filters even if you only have to take it once.

          LOL! absolutely.

          I think the skills tested on tech interviews are important, though; At least fundamentals. I don't encounter many people that consider time and space complexity of a unit of code (big O notation) and that's unfortunate.

          Data structs and their method for language built-ins are already optimized so I get that most people just use them but man, I see so many developers not even choose the correct structures. That includes me until I started leetcoding for a new job after 4 years of professionally work.

          But of course, this needs to stay in reason. Asking Brainteasers and optimizations like dynamic programming are dick moves. I don't want my team to prematurely optimize and make our code base complex just cause.