The legal ruling against the Internet Archive has come down in favour of the rights of authors.

  • Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wonder if you would feel that way if you were one of the artists whose copyrighted media was distributed illegally?

    • candyman337@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You realize this is about books right? This is about free and easy access to books. Like a digital library. Don’t be ridiculous.

          • damndotcommie@lemmy.basedcount.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, you have completely changed my mind here. I am uploading all my work to github and all my pics as we speak for everyone to use as they please. Give me a break. Are you really that childish in person, or is it just the screen and keyboard giving you this false machismo?

            • candyman337@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’m not being childish, you’re being ridiculous. This is a library, this is a concept that already exists. You’re thinking too profit oriented, not everything has to be for profit. This is so that people have access to these things now and for generations to come. Copyright laws compromising the internet archive will mean loss of data over the next few generations. There is already so much lost media from the internet era, and so little is being done about it, aside from the awesome efforts of the internet archive.

              This isn’t about profits this is about preserving data from our era.

              There’s more to this argument but it’s already been said in this thread and I don’t feel like typing it out, and I doubt you’d change your mind anyway.

            • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’m also a dev. I do upload my work other than my day job work since it’s my employers copyright not mine. You can check out my GitHub which is the same as my username here.

              Regardless though, libraries have existed for decades in the real world - but suddenly in a digital form it’s some unimaginable and unforgivable thing? Give me a break.

    • auth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The problem is that copyright last way to fucking long and they keep extending it. It should be the same as patents… 15 years I think.

      • Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree, but the internet archive doesn't have the authority to roll the duration back right? So it was illegal. We all agree the law needs to change, but it is still the law currently.

      • damndotcommie@lemmy.basedcount.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well the average career is 30 years. So you think that if I was to start a photography business that at the end of my 30 year run, half of my career should be publicly available? That means that people could use half of my life’s work without owing me any compensation? Copyright protects a lot of small creators, not just Disney and the likes.