• @grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    110 days ago

    How about a society that isn’t predicated on the exploitation of others?

    Some societies are objectively more pleasant to humans than others, otherwise we wouldn’t strive at all

    • @lath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      110 days ago

      Any society needs resources. In order for a society to grow or maintain itself, their consumption of resources must not exceed the production of it. Should we pursue a society that doesn’t depend on the heavy exploitation of resources, it would mean to severely limit the reproduction of its population within the society’s means of sustaining them. Our planet does not have the capability to sustain our current 8 billion population.

      Many of us will die and after that many would be restricted in their rights for procreation.

      As such, while those societies might be pleasant for some humans, the ones it needs to get rid of to achieve its desired status won’t be too happy with it needing them gone.

      • @grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        110 days ago

        I think it’s doable. Sure we won’t have so much cheap crap in the north, but no one needs to starve.

        • @lath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          210 days ago

          It might be. Depends on the people really. Hopefully there will be a good example to follow.