It looks like the internet archive is needed assistance, I just heard about this today and figured lemmy could help spread this message around

    • @Moorshou@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      1421 days ago

      Another excerpt under why from the FAQ section

      **The Internet Archive has been scanning millions of print books that they own, and loaning them out to anyone around the world, for free. Other libraries like the Boston Public Library are using the same process to make digital books too.

      This is happening because major publishers offer no option for libraries to permanently purchase digital books and carry out their traditional role of preservation.

      Instead, libraries are forced to pay high licensing fees to “rent” books from big tech vendors that regard patron privacy as a premium feature and are vulnerable to censorship from book banners. Under this regime, publishers act as malicious gatekeepers, preventing the free flow of information and undermining libraries’ ability to serve their patrons.

      But it looks bad if publishers sue the Boston Public Library. So instead, they’ve launched an attack on a groundbreaking nonprofit, including a lawsuit with clear repercussions for every library in the US. On March 24, 2023, a lower court judge issued a ruling that stated the profits of big media companies are more important than the right of libraries to preserve our history and ensure it’s available to the world. Then, in a copyright troll move for the ages, the same attorney representing Big Publishing filed a second absurd lawsuit against the Internet Archive for it’s research library of old music recordings.

      Nevertheless, the Internet Archive are appealing to a higher court and will keep fighting for the digital rights of libraries.**

      • @wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        This buries the lede so deep it’s popping out the other side of the globe.

        The entire core of this case is that (in abscence of more lenient agreements with publishers) traditional libraries are allowed to digitize physical books in their posession, as long as they do not lend out more copies than they physically own. The Internet Archive decided that they would lend out infinite copies, because “covid lol”.

        Boston Public Library isn’t being sued because they don’t lend out more than they own! It has precisely zero to do with fucking optics.

        Edit: Don’t get me wrong, I hope they win this case, but them continuing to play stupid helps nobody. Unfortunately, as discussed thoroughly online when they opened the covid19 emergency digital library, they fucked around. Now it seems they may have to find out.